TIMES must be hard when the toffs, tweeds, and tickety boo brigade start pleading poverty, writes Chris Holme.
It was not quite like that when the delegates from the Union of European Historic Houses Associations sat down for their annual meeting in Edinburgh yesterday.
But the setting was a bit of a giveaway. Prestonfield House Hotel exudes the same kind of gently fading elegance as befits an organisation representing the 20,000 private owners of the finest castles and houses in Europe.
The two-day bash has been organised by the Historic Houses Association which is anxious to dispel the old stately home image.
HHA president William Proby said Brideshead is no more: ''The days of hundreds of servants in livery waiting hand and foot are long gone. That's a very old stereotype. It's much more like running a business now. There is a new generation of owners who question a lot of the practices of the past.''
There are 42 stately homes in Scotland open regularly to the public - more than the National Trust for Scotland and Historic Scotland put together - bringing in tourists and 1000 jobs.
The basic problem was upkeep: around #100,000 a year for the average sized stately home. Mr Proby said he had no problem with access in exchange for support and he was not after pity.
''That is the last thing I would want. What we are saying is that we are doing a job which benefits everybody, including ourselves, and it is cost effective. But we need a bit of help.''
Mr Proby and his colleagues have been talking to Government.
''We have had some very constructive meetings with them. They are putting forward the idea of partnership,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article