A FIFE father is to take the Child Support Agency to the European Court.
The CSA has been pursuing Mark Cook for #170 maintenance per month despite acknowledging that he shares custody of his son Russell, 12, with his former-wife, Caroline.
Mr Cook, who looks after his son every alternate week, is now facing financial ruin after the CSA arrested his wages as a retained firefighter.
Mr Cook, 35, of Cupar Mills, Cupar, Fife, yesterday said he has now turned to Europe having exhausted all options open to him under the British judicial system.
His case has been through three independent tribunals but he has lost each time because he allowed his former wife to retain Russell's child benefit book.
As a result, the CSA claims Mr Cook is an absent father and is liable to pay child maintenance, even though it has accepted in a letter that he looks after his son 50% of the time.
An application has been lodged with the European Court for the case.
Mr Cook said he remained on ''amicable'' terms with his ex-wife after they separated in May 1995. Their divorce came through last month.
Russell wanted to spend equal time with both parents, who have since found new partners, and the 50/50 custody arrangement was drawn up to minimise interference with his education at Bell Baxter school in Cupar.
Mr Cook, who also works as a clerk of works with Fife Council, said: ''This case is crucifying me. Between that and the divorce I am having to start all over again. I have to work every bit of overtime going. It is become really hard to see my son when he's at my house.''
Local MP Liberal Democrat Menzies Campbell has written to Social Security Minister Alistair Darling stating that Mr Cook's claims that he is being discriminated against are ''fully justified''.
A spokesman for the CSA said: ''We shall be discussing this with our solicitors.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article