Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) grew exponentially in the boom years and crumbled just as fast in the wake of the financial crisis.
The 300-year-old bank's swift fall from grace came soon after it pronounced itself to be one of the world's biggest players.
Former boss Sir Fred Goodwin boasted RBS had vaulted "to the top of the premier league" with its part in the £49 billion deal to capture Dutch rival ABN Amro just over a year ago.
But the deal instead catapulted it towards disaster, and within months it was asking shareholders for £12 billion in the biggest rights issue in UK corporate history.
It was to be the first of several uncomfortable records for the bank, which soon found itself announcing its first losses in 40 years for the first half of 2008.
RBS now finds itself 70% owned by the Government after an unprecedented bail-out in which it was on the receiving end of £20 billion of public money. Its stock now lingers at a level not seen for 25 years and talk of nationalisation is never far away.
While RBS is by no means the only institution to have been brought to its knees by the financial turmoil, its position at the very heart of UK banking has meant the scale of its troubles is all the more devastating.
The firm's website proclaims: "Our history is very much the history of banking in the British Isles for the past four centuries."
Established in 1727 at a single branch in the Edinburgh Old Town, it was almost 60 years before RBS made its first tentative expansion - a new office in Glasgow in 1783. It was another 91 years before the first London branch was opened and the bank began to grow in England and Wales.
RBS began its international expansion in 1985 with the acquisition of Citizens Financial Group of Rhode Island in the US.
But it was not until after Sir Fred joined the business in 1998 that the firm moved into the ranks of the world elite - and away from its image as chiefly a high street bank.
Sir Fred masterminded a £21 billion takeover of NatWest in March 2000 - the biggest deal in UK banking history - and was lauded for his success.
And in 2004, a 10.5 billion US dollar (£5.3 billion) acquisition of US bank Charter One doubled the size of the Citizens business and elevated the local retail bank to one of the 10 largest commercial banks in the US.
Other buys included Direct Line car insurer Churchill and by this time Sir Fred had attracted accusations of empire-building and was under pressure from his own shareholders worried by the number of acquisitions made by the bank.
But it was the ABN deal, which RBS completed in conjunction with Fortis and Santander, which has been blamed for a large part of the bank's troubles.
Fears that it is exposed to further losses from toxic assets lurking in its US business and ABN have helped drag confidence in the business to rock bottom.
And not only has ABN contributed to the bank's write-downs, the cost of the deal also knocked its balance sheet.
Prime Minister Gordon Brown pointed the finger of blame at the ABN purchase when the bank announced its staggering losses last month.
"Today's write-off by the Royal Bank of Scotland is for irresponsible losses accumulated in American sub-prime markets that partly derive from the acquisition of the Dutch bank ABN Amro," he said.
The business was seized from the hands of rival Barclays at the very height of the market.
As the final papers were signed in October 2007, the Northern Rock crisis was already under way - the first icy blast of a storm that was to engulf the financial world.
Click here to comment on this story...
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article