THE murder of Kriss Donald was an appalling crime of inhumanity against a defenceless boy for racial motives, a court was told yesterday.
Advocate-depute Mark Stewart, QC, prosecuting, also said in his closing speech to the jury at the High Court in Edinburgh that the killing was carried out with extraordinary rage and thirst for vengeance.
Zeeshan Shahid, 28, together with his brother Imran, 29, and Mohammed Faisal Mushtaq, 27, who were brought back from Pakistan to stand trial, deny the murder charge and blame others for the death of Kriss.
Mr Stewart suggested that trips to Pakistan by the three men were an "unimaginable coincidence". He claimed the evidence during the trial showed that all three accused had been acting together.
"The involvement of each in this dreadful deed would be shown at the beginning, in the middle and at the end, " he said.
The lawyer also warned the jury of nine women and six men that sentiment must play no part in their verdict.
During more than four weeks of evidence, the trial has heard how Kriss, 15, was snatched from a street in the Pollokshields area of Glasgow, driven to Dundee and back in a silver Mercedes and finally stabbed, doused with petrol and set on fire.
The schoolboy's burned and bloodied body was found beside the Clyde Walkway near Celtic's training ground on the morning of March 16, 2004. "That crime can be described as one of the worst and most appalling crimes of inhumanity against an effectively defenceless boy, " said Mr Stewart.
"But it is essential, ladies and gentlemen, that while these sentiments cannot be ignored they must be banished from your thinking when considering the guilt or innocence of these men."
He went on to claim that forensic, technical and eyewitness evidence about the events of March 15, 2004 - including alleged attempts at a cover-up - proved his case.
The three accused had also "disappeared abroad in an attempt to avoid detection", added Mr Stewart.
The lawyer also claimed the three accused had condemned themselves "from their own mouths" by things they had said about their intentions when they were setting out, statements during the crime itself and admissions of responsibility afterwards.
"The murder of Kriss Donald is one which, you may think, makes their attempts in the course of this trial to divert attention away from the evidence by attacking the character of Crown witnesses all the more shameful, particularly when many of these people were their own former friends and associates."
One man, Daanish Zahid, 22, is already serving a life sentence for abducting and murdering Kriss.
Another, Zahid Mohammed, 22, served half of a five-year jail sentence for assaulting Kriss and lying to police then returned to court to give evidence against the three men now on trial.
Mr Stewart said it was no part of these proceedings to look at the decision to drop a murder charge against Zahid Mohammed. "There was no murder charge hanging over him when he started giving his evidence, " said Mr Stewart.
He reminded them how Zahid Mohammed had told of Imran Shahid's "unreasonable and extraordinary rage and thirst for vengeance" had followed a supposed incident in a Glasgow city-centre nightclub.
Imran Shahid blamed "white boys" from McCulloch Street, Pollokshields, for a bottle attack and threatened to "chop them up and take their eyes out". Mr Stewart added: "It is clear, ladies and gentlemen, this enterprise had a racist motive."
Mr Stewart yesterday said he was dropping all other charges against the three, to "clear the decks" and allow the jury to focus on the abduction and murder allegations.
The trial continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article