SHE is the human face of a recurring tragedy that costs (pounds) 500m a year.
Twelve-year-old Suzanne McGuire was on her way to the Big Adventure play area when she was killed by an uninsured driver as she crossed the road in Linwood.
The High Court in Glasgow heard that George Anderson, 19, then sped off in the car he and his friends had bought for (pounds) 30. He abandoned it and dropped the keys down a drain in an attempt to hide his shocking crime.
Anderson, who had been driving ''like an idiot'' at 60mph in the H-registration Vauxhall Cavalier when he raced into Suzanne, from Houston, Renfrewshire, in December 2002, was jailed for five years in March.
Four years earlier, another heartbreaking story unfolded at the High Court in London when a medical research technician whose life was shattered when he was struck by an uninsured van driver, won a (pounds) 1m agreed damages settlement.
Robert Sharp, 36, an honours graduate in biochemistry from Glasgow University, suffered appalling head injuries when he was hurled 16yds after being struck by the van as he crossed a road in London, months after he had landed a job there. The accident left Mr Sharp, who was brought up in Galston, Ayrshire, with severe brain damage.
The tragic stories of Suzanne and Mr Sharp are among thousands that finally prompted the government yesterday to unveil a series of plans to tackle the problem of uninsured drivers, including seizing and destroying their cars.
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) estimates that around one in 20 drivers, one million people, currently do not have insurance cover in the UK. According to the RAC Foundation, 150,000 flout the law in Scotland.
Some of the worst offenders are the testosterone-fuelled young male drivers. More than a third of male drivers aged 18-20 have driven without insurance or a licence, say the RAC.
In Scotland, recent figures showed 14,520 cases led to a conviction for driving without insurance. The worst area was Strathclyde with 6237, followed by Lothian and Borders with 2448.
Grampian, Tayside, and Fife police areas accounted for more than 1000 convictions each, with Northern Constabulary and Dumfries and Galloway relatively law-abiding with 580 cases each.
In the UK as a whole, it cost those who do have insurance around (pounds) 30 a year each in higher premiums. But the cost to motorists does not end there, with many drivers having to foot the bill if they are involved in a collision with an uninsured driver.
Insurer Direct Line estimates that, after paying their policy excess and losing any no-claims bonus, being hit by an uninsured driver costs motorists about (pounds) 400.
Recent research carried out by the group found that, despite not having any motor cover, 73% of uninsured drivers believe they drive carefully and within the law, while 60% say they do not bother to get cover because they think it is unlikely they will have an accident.
However, the ABI found uninsured drivers were actually three times more likely to have been convicted for driving without due care and attention, and 10 times more likely to have been convicted for drink driving. They are also six times more likely to have been convicted for driving an unroadworthy vehicle.
The ABI found that around 15% of drivers admitted to driving without insurance at some time and, despite 85% recognising it was a serious offence, most felt the chances of getting caught were low.
The insurance industry has long been calling for police to make greater use of the insurers' database that contains vehicle details.
It has also called for a link to be set up between the database and the DVLA to flag up motorists who have their car taxed but then cancel their insurance.
The ABI said the three European countries with the lowest incidence of uninsured driving were Sweden, Germany, and Belgium, where police all used a database.
Barry Smith, chairman of the ABI's motor committee, added: ''For too long, the honest motorist has paid for the crime of uninsured driving. We welcome the government's intention to bring in more effective penalties, particularly seizure of vehicles.''
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article