JANE Tomlinson is the ultimate cancer survivor.
She was diagnosed with terminal breast cancer in 2000. It spread to her bones, affecting her spine and pelvis, and the hip, leg, and shoulder on the left side of her body. As a result of drug treatments, she also developed chronic heart disease. But at the start of this month, her athletic prowess captured the hearts and minds of Britain again after she finished a gruelling nine-week, 3700-mile fundraising Ride Across America.
Six years after being told she had just six months left to live, the mother-of-three, who had been seriously ill since leaving San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge in July, rode into New York's Battery Park and the arms of her husband, Mike, 45, and son, Steven, nine.
After a journey that she was almost too sick to begin and had said she wished she never embarked upon, Mrs Tomlinson said: "I'm just delighted to be here. It's a huge relief."
The exhausting ride to raise money for cancer charities is thought to be the greatest endurance feat completed by someone dying of the disease. As well as battling her body, Tomlinson faced repeated attacks by dogs, strong winds and temperatures of more than 120F.
Just two days before riding into the Big Apple, her supporters considered calling off the rest of the ride as the 42year-old's condition worsened and it looked like she would have to be taken to hospital.
Mr Tomlinson said his wife had insisted on battling on despite the challenge "lurching from one crisis to another" and several days when she could barely even walk or stand.
"But I knew the minute she started that it would take a huge injury to stop her doing this. It wasn't going to come from her feeling sick from the cancer."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article