A MAN who died from toxic shock should have been in hospital hours before he finally received medical assistance, an expert told a fatal accident inquiry yesterday.
Dr Dermot Kennedy, an infectious disease consultant, said if he had been in the position of a nurse adviser at the helpline, NHS 24, he would have called an ambulance for Steven Wiseman, 30, from Laurencekirk, Aberdeenshire.
Mr Wiseman died in December last year from streptococcal toxic shock
(STS).
His fiancee made three phone calls in two days to NHS 24, and was told he was displaying flu-like symptoms and to give him paracetamol and ibuprofen. A doctor came to the house on December 21, and Mr Wiseman was taken to Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, where he died
Dr Kennedy, of Gartnavel General Hospital in Glasgow, yesterday at Aberdeen Sheriff Court examined the transcripts of three calls made to NHS 24 on December 19 and 21. In one call, in the early hours of December 21, Mr Wiseman tells the adviser his arm is painful and he is
having difficulty breathing because he is "sore".
He is told it is likely he has flu.
Dr Kennedy said these symptoms were not flu-like.
Christine McCrossan, a solicitor representing the Wiseman family, asked DrKennedy, 61, what he would consider to be the "clinically safe" outcome for a call with someone describing such symptoms. "At this stage he should be in hospital, " he said. "He should have been in hospital before that, but certainly by this stage."
He said an urgent admission to hospital after this call would probably have been the "last opportunity" to save his life.
During questioning by David Holmes, representing the GPs who saw Mr Wiseman before he was taken to hospital, Dr Kennedy agreed that
when Mr Wiseman was seen on December 20, his pulse and temperature were normal.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article