GEOFF Hoon yesterday castigated a press report of allegations that British troops mutilated the bodies of Iraqi fighters following a fierce firefight between Iraqi militia and soldiers of the Argyll and Sutherland Highlanders.
The Ministry of Defence confirmed military police were looking into the claims outlined in the Guardian yesterday. But during defence questions in the Commons, the defence secretary told Paul Keetch, the Liberal Democrat defence spokesman, who raised the issue: ''I read the story in some detail across two pages and I hope he would accept from me that the headline in the story could just as easily have been 'More false allegations against British troops' because the detail of the story did not bear out the rather lurid headline the Guardian editor chose to adopt.''
The headline read: 'UK troops accused of mutilating Iraqi bodies.' The strapline below added: 'Death certificates by Iraqi doctor claim evidence of torture.'
Mr Hoon went on: ''These kinds of issues are arising on a regular basis, but I certainly give the house and him my assurance that each of them involving British troops will be thoroughly investigated.''
The allegations involve Iraqi fighters who were killed during a skirmish near the town of Majar al Kabir last month and appeared in death certificates written by Dr Adel Salid Majid, director of the town's hospital, the day after the May 15
firefight.
Dr Majid claimed some of the 22 corpses handed over to the hospital by British troops showed signs of mutilation and torture, reported the paper, which had seen the certificates.
However, his assessment was challenged by another senior Iraqi doctor who saw one of the dead men at Amara general hospital, where the bodies were first taken. He argued the wounds he saw were consistent with a fierce gun battle.
An incensed British Army spokesman in Basra branded the allegations as ''absurd''.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article