YOUR decision to replace Iain Mac-whirter with Gerry Hassan at least secures continuity. Although both correspondents live, we would wager, in leafy suburbs, both feel able to comment dismissively on the scale of the misery suffered by people who live in less affluent parts of the country. Perhaps they should spend less time pontificating and more time investigating what happens in the communities they seek to comment on.
Hassan asks if turf wars over hedges are really more serious than litter or graffiti. Ask that of anyone who has to suffer the daily grind of abuse, noise, drunkenness, and violence from their own neighbours. They would shake their heads in amazement at the ignorance of the comfortable middle classes who would be so blind and deaf as to ask the question in the first place.
Hassan's claim that we are attacking the poor and the young similarly fails to stand up to scrutiny. It is widely accepted that a small minority of young people do a disproportionate amount of damage to their communities. It is also accepted that young, predominantly socially disadvantaged, people are the main victims of this sort of behaviour. How, then, is tackling the problem an attack on poor young people? That is like saying moves to deal with sectarianism are an attack on Christians.
To be fair to Mr Hassan, his vantage point in comfortable middle-class academia is probably not the best place from which to comment on this debate. We would, therefore, be more than happy to extend an open invitation to him, or any of your other correspondents who feel politicians have invented this issue for electoral purposes, to visit Inverclyde and listen to people who live with utterly unacceptable behaviour day-in, day-out. Perhaps then it would no longer be seen as acceptable to ignore our decent, hard-working communities.
David Cairns, MP for Greenock and Inverclyde; Duncan McNeil,
MSP for Greenock and Inverclyde.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article