A BARMAN sacked for swearing at the president of a Rangers supporters

social club has won his unfair dismissal claim.

A Glasgow industrial tribunal has awarded Mr Leslie Jeffrey #1706

compensation but ruled that he was 10% to blame.

Mr Jeffrey, 38, assistant bar manager at the Rangers FC Supporters

Association Social Club in Edmiston Drive, Glasgow, landed in trouble

when he turned up over an hour late for work on Saturday, October 31,

the day of a home game at Ibrox.

He claimed that he was ''dog tired'' afer a strenuous week and he had

been working under pressure. The club was expecting a busy day.

Club president Mr Wallace Watson had a word with him and Mr Jeffrey

told him to ''Go to f...'' and to ''Get off my f...ing back''. Mr

Jeffrey tried to apologise to the president that night but was told that

a committee meeting was to take place next day to decide what was to

happen.

The committee decided that swearing at the president was the last

straw and that he should be dismissed.

Mr Jeffrey, of 7 Kennedar Drive, Linthouse, Govan, said that he was

''struck dumb''.

Mr Watson said there was acceptable and unacceptable swearing and Mr

Jeffrey cursing him fell into the latter category.

The tribunal heard that bar staff had been issued with warning letters

about stock shortages but Mr Jeffrey had not bothered to open his. The

tribunal said that this showed Mr Jeffrey's attitude towards the

committee.

In their findings, the tribunal said the dismissal was unfair because

of the method adopted.

It said that it was no small organisation, yet it was run by

office-bearers who could make no claims to be schooled in management.

The club had a bar turnover in excess of #600,000 a year and over 3000

members. Its bar could accommodate 400 people.

The tribunal said that Mr Jeffrey was virtually in contempt of his

employers and this situation would not have been allowed to develop in a

more sophisticated organisation.

The tribunal said that it was not saying that his dismissal was not

deserved but that it was unfair procedurally. It found that he was 10%

to blame as the environment which had been allowed to develop could have

encouraged Mr Jeffrey to think he could act as he did.