Dublin,
IRISH Prime Minister Albert Reynolds yesterday revealed the extent of
his frustration with the IRA when he admitted his disappointment that
the Downing Street peace declaration had not yet borne fruit.
He also cast doubts on Sinn Fein's ability to exert control over the
IRA and deliver peace.
As the first Irish Prime Minister to address the British-Irish
inter-parliamentary body in Dublin yesterday, he told the MPs: ''There
are worrying signs of a return to tit-for-tat murders.''
He vigorously defended the agreement with Mr Major as removing ''any
vestige of justification for continued violence by either republican or
loyalist paramilitaries''.
In a speech, which was warmly appreciated by the British delegation,
Mr Reynolds questioned the capacity of Sinn Fein, the IRA's political
wing, to deliver a permanent cessation of violence.
''The best ever opportunity for peace is being put in danger,'' Mr
Reynolds said, urging the IRA to accept that coercion would not produce
a united Ireland.
Mr Reynolds said he sympathised with the growing public scepticism
about the sincerity of Sinn Fein's talk about peace while IRA violence
was on the rise again.
''How can we be confident in the good faith of the republican
movement, when members engage with increasing frequency in continuing
murder while peace is being actively discussed?'' he asked.
''Are these events a sign that the unity and discipline in that
organisation (the IRA) is not as strong as is often supposed? Do they
have the ability and coherence to agree to peace, on a basis that either
of our democracies could accept?''
Addressing himself to loyalist terrorists, Mr Reynolds said their
''nightmare'' of being forced into a united Ireland against the will of
the majority Protestant population would never happen. ''The people of
the South do not want it to happen, and will not allow it to happen.
They have no justification for murdering innocent people.''
Northern Ireland Secretary Sir Patrick Mayhew also renewed his call to
the IRA to abandon violence. He said: ''To continue with violence is not
only to continue on a course that inflicts profound evil, it is to
continue to exist in a political cul-de-sac.''
Sinn Fein, however, insisted the blame for the continued conflict lay
with the British Government. Party chairman Mitchel McLaughlin said Sinn
Fein accepted there was a yawning gap between itself and the British
Government that had to be bridged, but that the Government had been
''inflexible''.
Meanwhile the killing continued.
A man was gunned down late last night in a car at Springfield Park on
the Roman Catholic side of the ''peace line'' between Catholic and
Protestant areas.
The RUC said the car was turning at the end of a cul-de-sac when it
was fired on from two points on the loyalist side of the divide.
The shooting appeared to be a loyalist retaliation for the Irish
National Liberation Army killing of a man and wounding of his son-in-law
as they worked in a fishing tackle shop at the Northcott Centre,
Glengormley, near Belfast.
The dead man was named as Mr Gerry Evans, married and in his 40s, who
opened the shop only last week. The injured man, a Protestant, was said
to be ''ill but stable''.
It was the seventh murder in the past week carried out by republican
and loyalist terror groups.
In a Belfast court, Royal Marine Derek William Charles Adgey, 23,
faced charges of conspiracy to murder and was remanded on bail into
military custody.
The charges included conspiring to murder a Mr Brian Gillen;
conspiring to murder a person or persons he suspected of being members
of the IRA at a house in west Belfast; conspiring to murder taxi firm
employees; and collecting information about persons he suspected of
being members of the IRA which would be useful to the Ulster Freeedom
Fighters in carrying out murders.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article