MORE than 10% of eligible prisoners opted out of seeking parole last
year, new figures showed yesterday.
One reason, the Parole Board for Scotland claims, is the ''fantasy''
in some prisons about the system.
Launching its annual report for 1993 which showed that 155 of the 1433
eligible prisoners opted out, chairman Joseph Scott said prisoners often
believed they would not qualify.
There was ''quite a lot of fantasy'' circulating among prisoners about
who would, or would not, be given parole.
''We try to indicate we deal with prisoners on an individual basis and
not in terms of categories or groups,'' he said.
Figures also showed 465 lifers have been released since the parole
system was introduced in 1968.
During that time 132 had been recalled to custody, including 39 who
had been recalled on more than one occasion although 44 had subsequently
been re-released.
Asked if the board had made mistakes, Mr Scott said there were often
pressures on prisoners outside and their behaviour could regress. For
the sake of the individual and the public they were recalled.
He said it illustrated people were just not released on licence
without any follow-up supervision.
Board vice-chairman Ian McNee said the board tried to ensure mistakes
were not repeated by analysing its judgment first time round.
Asked if more resources should be put into Training for Freedom, the
chairman said the prison service recognised the need for the scheme for
long-term prisoners. ''We would encourage them to develop it even
further,'' he said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article