GOSSIPING pupils made it impossible for a religious education teacher
to return to work after having a baby by a Catholic priest, an
industrial tribunal heard yesterday.
The news that teacher Monika Kocanek was expecting a child by Father
Chris O'Neill had quickly spread around St Thomas More School in
Bedford.
Head teacher John McManus told the tribunal: ''There was a gathering
swell of rumour and speculation among staff and among pupils. I was
informed by staff that pupils had been asking awkward questions.''
He added: ''She could not teach because the father of the child was a
local priest, well-known in school and town. It was impossible that it
could be kept quiet.''
Asked what his reaction was when two other unmarried teachers at the
school became pregnant, Mr McManus said: ''I wouldn't say that it didn't
cause embarrassment.''
But he added: ''The women were not in the RE department and not
pregnant by a priest . . . we wished to support them.''
Mr McManus was giving evidence at the tribunal in which the RE
teacher, now Mrs O'Neill, is claiming unfair dismissal and sex
discrimination against the governors of the school and Bedfordshire
County Council.
Mrs O'Neill, 29, claims she was offered ''lumps of money'' to leave
the voluntary-aided school which has 680 pupils.
She said Father O'Neill, 40, had been given the full protection of the
Church when news of their affair broke.
He was moved from the Holy Cross Church in Bedford to a secret address
in London and then on to a therapeutic centre in Birmingham.
Their baby, Jennifer, was born on May 20, 1992. In the autumn of that
year, the couple got back together.
They married last October and now have a second child --
seven-month-old Aaron.
The tribunal continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article