It has been marred by problems with the design, location and even the roof, but the Holyrood building is facing another headache: this time over its lifts.
Parliament officials have confirmed they gave £1.5 million in elevator contracts to a company which has been fined for its part in a price-fixing scandal. Holyrood bosses are now investigating whether Otis, which admitted being part of the "lift cartel", overcharged the taxpayer as part of its illegal practices.
A Scottish parliament spokesman said officials would study the contract and added: "The fine imposed by the European Commission relates to cartels in mainland Europe. The maintenance contract was awarded in line with the parliament's strict procurement guidance. Our procurement staff will be checking the contract in detail."
The cash row follows the European Commission's decision earlier this year to fine four companies nearly one billion euros for their role in carving up elevator contracts across Europe.
It was found that lift manufacturers ThyssenKrupp, Kone, Schindler and Otis fixed prices, rigged bids and shared contracts across Europe between 1995 and 2004.
One of the rigged bids included the European Commission's own lift contract for its headquarters in Brussels, as well as the Court of Justice in Luxembourg.
It has now emerged that Otis, owned by US-based United Technologies, was the company that installed the elevators in the Scottish parliament. Holyrood accounts show the company received £1.3m of public money for the installation, testing and certification of 13 lifts.
Only two companies, Otis and Schindler, submitted bids during the final stage of the procurement process for the contract, both of which were part of the same cartel. The contract was signed in 2000, a period in which the illegal activity was found to have taken place.
Budget documents also reveal Otis received £35,799 for lift maintenance services in 2005, followed by another four-year contract worth £121,000.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article