As controversy rages once again, Alison Hardie reports on one man's rocky road to Parliament.
IT would be one of the greatest understatements in current politics to say Mohammed Sarwar is no stranger to controversy.
Along every step of his journey to Parliament to become Britain's first Muslim MP, Mr Sarwar's progress has attracted a level of publicity that left other political hopefuls wringing their hands in despair.
His first sortie on to the national stage was in the depths of winter 1993, when it was first announced he would stand for the newly-created Glasgow Govan seat against sitting MP Mike Watson, whose constituency had been eradicated during a boundary carve-up.
Amid much huffing and puffing about dirty tricks and smear campaigns, it was Mr Sarwar's camp which was first to see the potential of playing the ''race card''.
Since then, it was been argued the Pakistani-born multi-millionaire cynically traded on his race to win the nomination to stand on the hustings as the official Labour candidate, while others claim Mr Sarwar has been a victim of an insidious campaign of racism aimed at keeping the face of Scottish politics white.
Yet he was to come through the mire to take the Govan seat with a comfortable majority of 2914 and, six days ago, the 46-year-old became the first member of the House of Commons to take the MPs' swearing-in oath using the Koran.
Born in a village near Faisalabad, Mr Sarwar followed his father to Scotland, where he had moved to sell clothes on the Clyde coast, regularly sending money back to his family.
In Pakistan, young Sarwar won a scholarship to study political science and as a teenager he whetted his political appetite by joining the Pakistan People's party and supported Zulfikar Ali Bhutto.
Married, with three sons and a daughter, and owner of a cash-and-carry empire, he has been a Labour Party member since 1984 and was a Labour councillor in Glasgow for three years.
Mr Sarwar's close circle, among which he can include influential businessmen, politicians, and well-placed sources within the media, said he was in chipper mood after his election win and eagerly anticipating playing his role in the pomp surrounding the Queen's Speech.
All the while, however, persistent rumours were circulating about the validity of the vote in Govan. Not even Mr Sarwar's painstakingly-cultivated contacts could prevent them bubbling to the surface.
No-one was surprised, perhaps least of all Mr Sarwar, who has long complained he was the victim of a vendetta aimed at thwarting his political ambition.
His first taste of controversy came even before he became the candidate for Govan - normally a safe Labour seat but which had been won sporadically in the past by Scottish nationalists.
A re-run of the candidacy battle between him and Mr Mike Watson - Mr Watson won the original contest by one vote - was ordered after allegations of skulduggery on both sides.
There was claim and counter-claim alleging vote-rigging in the battle for the seat, with names appearing and disappearing amidst confusion over who was and was not eligible to vote.
There were also questions raised over Mr Sarwar's spending in his campaigns for selection in 1995 and in this year's election.
Mr Watson was MP for Glasgow Central, a seat which disappeared under boundary changes, reducing the total number of Glasgow seats - all held by Labour.
This in turn prompted fierce in-fighting by Labour parliamentary incumbents and hopefuls in Glasgow for the seats that were left. The scenes created by opposing factions led to the worst in-fighting endured by the Scottish Labour Party for generations.
On one occasion, Mr Watson was moved to comment: ''I would question whether his (Sarwar) background qualifies him to become a Labour MP. He is a successful millionaire just seeking to add another string to his bow.''
Mr Sarwar was to reply: ''I do not think it matters at all whether Mohammed Sarwar or Michael Watson sits in Westminster for the people of Govan, the only thing is that Labour wins.''
On May 1, Mr Sarwar and Labour did win in Govan but controversy was to erupt again.
Earlier this week, Mr Sarwar said he was planning legal action against unidentified enemies who, he said, were waging a whispering campaign against him.
Police have already started an investigation into claims that several voters gained late entry to Govan's electoral roll.
Mr Sarwar said earlier this week: ''As far as I am concerned, we ran a creditable, honest campaign. People should accept the democratic will of the people of Govan.''
In the short term, Mr Sarwar has achieved his aim - a win for Labour. Whether in the long term Mr Tony Blair's party will view it as a victory or a public relations disaster heralding the re-emergence of sleaze remains to be seen.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article