In a rare move, a jury went to Edinburgh Castle yesterday to view the scene of a dramatic rockface rescue which a firefighter feared might cost him his life.
Mr Charles Stuart went to help a man who had become stuck on the castle rock in the early hours of the morning.
Mr Stuart now suffers from post-traumatic stress disorder and told the jury yesterday that that he feels like a prisoner in his own home.
In his action at the Court of Session Mr Stuart, 52, who never returned to work after the incident, is claiming damages of #150,000 from Lothian and Borders Fire Board.
He alleges that the system adopted for the rescue was inherently unsafe and that he was not provided with proper equipment.
The board denies liability and says that the rescue operation on March 29, 1993, was the same as had been used for many years without incidence of injury.
Before evidence began at the Court of Session, Edinburgh, yesterday, lawyers asked Lord Eassie to allow the jury to visit the castle to inspect the rescue scene. The judge agreed that court officials could accompany jurors to vantage points.
After the visit Mr Stuart, of Baberton Mains Drive, Edinburgh, said in evidence that he was part of the crew from Tollcross fire station called to rescue a man stuck on the castle rock.
Mr Stuart had to descend on a rope from the ramparts to reach the stranded man. After his rescue was effected Mr Stuart got into difficulties trying to ascend.
''I began slipping and those above also began pulling the line at an angle. It pulled me right off and into the rocks. All I felt was myself smashing into the wall.''
Mr Stuart became stuck under an overhang, and became tangled in his rope, and, he said, he feared for his life.
He suffered injuries to his neck and chest, and was retired from the force on health grounds in 1994. He also suffered post-traumatic stress disorder, and felt scared to leave his house.
The hearing continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article