ROBERT
McLAUGHLAN rounds up the New Year drinks selection THE traditional
Scottish salute to the year's end was the national drink, whisky. It
still holds pride of place in our minds but is less secure in the glass
with younger tipplers, who have switched to vodka (usually tasteless in
itself) and new exotica, like cream liqueurs, where the success of
Bailey's Irish Cream has inspired copycats; or Malibu, which uses
coconut. An age of experimentation possibly leaves whisky looking staid.
Its promoters were slow to espouse the cocktail image naturally
exploited by gin.
This last is changing, and not just for whisky: makers of Cognac and
Calvados, good year-end warmers, both recommend mixing at least their
lower categories with various components to provide long drinks with a
reduced alcoholic kick. Courvoisier often serves visitors to its famous
chateau a complicated cocktail which contains passion-fruit, and goes
down pleasantly. One smaller Cognac house does a fine combined Pear
Williams and Cognac which I found entrancing last September but which is
not yet imported to the UK.
The essence of spirits is intensity, however; and something is lost in
too much dilution, though it can be said that adding rather a lot of
water to a strong-tasting whisky like Laphroaig produces a delicious
long drink which should be a revelation to those for whom its remarkable
Islay intensity is too much. Incidentally, the water should not be iced,
for a low temperature reduces the ability of the tastebuds to enjoy the
full measure of the flavour.
If anything other than water is being added to whisky, there is little
point in using rare and costly single malts. Green ginger wine was added
to whisky in our house on Hogmanays half a century ago, but that was
probably to eke it out rather than dilute it in days when half-bottles
were enough to evoke envy. A common dilution in the west of Scotland is
sweet lemonade. This always seems an abomination to connoisseurs but it
remains popular, a continuing example of our famous sweet tooth (for
whisky is sweet itself even without being made into post-prandial
stickies like Drambuie and Glayva, and their somewhat lighter competitor
produced by Glenturret).
Blended whiskies have been pushed out of the limelight by the
astonishing rise in demand for the finer malts whose qualities uplift
the grosser grain spirits. Malts were always dearer than grains, and
less plentiful. They delivered complexity as well as personality which
survived being cut by mass-produced, and so cheaper, liquor, something
true even of subtle and gentle Lowland singles, like Bladnoch or
Auchentoshan.
Blenders will tell you how many different whiskies go into their
blends, 40 into Lang's Supreme at the moment, near 100 into Ballantine's
a generation ago. The proportion of malt to grain is, of course,a trade
secret, no doubt lest the finished product is assessed by rather crude
arithmetic and not its taste, which should be the only arbiter, though
the blenders themselves depend far more on smell.
The alternatives to whisky are
legion. Many drinkers favour rum, which certainly keeps the cold out
equally well, as fishermen testify. Clever advertising keeps Black Heart
before our eyes but, like whisky, rum boasts some additional delights at
its higher and more expensive levels: a smooth, complex, and lingering
taste is delivered by Appleton Estate.
Port and sherry are not spirits but wines reinforced by brandy. Sales
of each seem to benefit from a surge of seasonal buying. Lots of houses
(Taylors, for example) are now offering tawnys in half-bottles; and many
supermarket sherries are also in half-bottles which helps to ensure that
we drink soon after opening rather than inflicting slow death on the
contents of half-empty bottles. Few should encounter that fate at New
Year.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article