THE HAGUE Former Liberian President Charles Taylor boycotted the landmark first international war crimes trial of a former African leader yesterday. His lawyer also walked out.
Karim Khan said Taylor had sacked him and wanted to act in his own defence. Khan then left even though the presiding judge repeatedly directed him to continue to represent Taylor, if only for the opening day.
The court ordered the trial to continue and chief prosecutor Stephen Rapp began by outlining the horrors inflicted on Sierra Leone villagers by forces allegedly under Taylor's control during a 10-year civil war.
The attackers would randomly murder people and enslave others to use as fighters, miners and farmers, Rapp said.
Then "the attackers would mutilate; amputating arms, limbs, gouging eyes. Children conscripted by the attackers killing their own parents."
Taylor, 59, has denied 11 charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity.
He was not in court. In a letter read out by Khan, Taylor claimed he had been prevented from seeing a court official charged with ensuring he is properly defended and that his one court-appointed lawyer was heavily outgunned by the prosecution team of nine.
"At one time I had confidence in this court's ability to dispense justice. Over time, it has become clear that confidence has been misplaced," Taylor's statement said. "I will not receive a fair trial."
Rapp, however, said Taylor was receiving more money for his defence - up to £1m - than any other suspect charged by the court.
Taylor was indicted in 2003, accused of sponsoring Sierra Leone's rebel Revolutionary United Front in exchange for diamonds. Taylor agreed to give up power and go into exile, but he was arrested in Nigeria in March 2006.
He was transferred to The Hague a year ago amid fears his trial in Sierra Leone could trigger fresh violence.
The trial, which is expected to last 18 months, continues on June 25.-AP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article