Canberra
Delegates to a constitutional convention today overwhelmingly supported Australia becoming a republic and cutting its remaining ties to the monarchy.
Applause broke out as the crucial vote in favour of a republic was passed by 89-52, with 11 abstentions.
The result is a great victory for republicans after their preferred model for a republic passed by only four votes.
The result also shows an absolute majority of the 152 delegates at the convention support a change.
When the convention opened two weeks ago, monarchist Prime Minister John Howard promised that he would put any model for a republic agreed by the convention to a public referendum by the end of 1999.
''The Australian people are owed the opportunity of expressing an opinion on this,'' Howard said.
Monarchists hope to defeat the republic at the referendum; pro-republicans want an Australian president by the opening of the 2000 Olympics and the 100th anniversary of Australian federation.
Polls have shown public support for a republic increasing, rising from about 35% several years ago to about 51% this year.
Howard said the Queen was taking a great interest in the convention but ''understands that the role of the Crown in Australia rests in the hands of the Australian people as it has for almost 100 years''.
The model for a republic, adopted over bitter objections from those advocating direct election of a president, is for presidential nominations to be made with public input and the winning candidate decided by a two-thirds majority of parliament.-AP
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article