THE row over replacement of the church organ at Crathie Kirk, where the royal family worships when at Balmoral, was moved on yesterday, with the Kirk Session approving the purchase of a digital computer instrument.
The problems began earlier this year, when organist Charles Taylor was sacked after 15 years service for protesting the session's refusal to repair and restore the traditional wind organ.
Prince Charles twice failed to attend Sunday morning service last month, prompting rumours of a royal boycott over the issue.
However, a Buckingham Palace spokeswoman said yesterday the Queen had not been involved in the dispute, nor had she made any offer to replace the old instrument.
''She has not taken any decision either way. That is very much for the Kirk, the elders, and the congregation to decide. Obviously, when any appeal for fund raising is decided, the question will be considered,'' she added.
A spokeswoman for the Prince of Wales denied his absence from church was a boycott and said he shared the Queen's opinion.
Estimates for rebuilding and maintaining the organ have risen from #150,000 to #200,000, compared to less than #15,000 for a digital instrument.
The session's recommendation to buy the latter will go before a meeting of the whole congregation on Tuesday week, with a call for a business plan to meet the Kirk's financial needs. It states that a new organ would also require little maintenance and could be used to pre-record music for use when the church is open to visitors, and at funerals and weddings.
The minister, the Reverend Robert Sloan, said, visually, the church would not be altered in any way, adding that searches of the kirk's records and the royal archives at Windsor had not shown any evidence that the organ, installed in 1896, had been gifted by Queen Victoria, as had been supposed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article