Barry Hughes is delaying making a decision as to his future in the sport until he has had time to reflect in depth on the ramifications of his surprise World Boxing Union continental lightweight title defeat against the Georgian, Nugzar Margvelashvile.
Hughes flew to London yesterday on business wearing a pair of dark glasses to help cover the trauma he has to his eyes after having suffered considerable damage prior to being stopped in the fourth round at Bellahouston Arena on Saturday evening on medical advice.
However, it was Hughes' pride that was hurt more than anything after his return to the ring following an absence of 12 months to attend to some unfinished business proved fruitless.
The pain of defeat was made all the more acute by the fact that Hughes had never been stopped in 20 contests. It was also the first time that the 29-year-old boxer has required stitches.
"I had never even been cut before so what happened came as a big shock," Hughes said. "The only other occasion when I have failed to finish a fight was when I was forced to retire with a broken hand.
"I have looked after my skin carefully over the years and have lived the good life, so fitness has never been a big problem to me. However, six years of competitive boxing has clearly taken its toll, as I found out when I moved up to title level.
"My pride certainly has been massively dented and I have to decide whether I want to make champions or try to be one myself, and the former would appear to be the more sensible option. That said, I will allow my injuries to heal first.
"However, at the same time, I don't want to go out with the memory of what happened on Saturday night being my last as a boxer.
"To be honest, I don't know what I am going to do. Now would be the wrong time to make such a huge decision and I will enjoy Christmas with my family before I make up my mind."
Hughes, who also manages and promotes boxers, added: "It was a bit of a shocker when I bruised up so early in the fight following a clash of heads that damaged my left eye.
"That threw my game plan straight out the window and it became an uphill struggle after that."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article