A royal commission today condemned the government for its failure to introduce free personal care for the elderly throughout the UK.
Four years after it was appointed to look into the matter after Labour's 1997 election victory, it delivered its report recommending the state should pay long-term care costs.
The nine commissioners issued an unprecedented statement warning that the problem remains ''acute and a matter of major public concern''.
While the government has since agreed to pay for nursing care, only the Scottish Executive has gone on to pay for personal care - such as help with washing, cooking and eating - as well.
The commissioners, chaired by Lord Sutherland of Houndwood, said the result was thousands of elderly people in the rest of the UK were being reduced to ''penury'' and forced to sell their homes before any state aid kicked in. They urged ministers to intervene to end the ''anomalies and injustices'' of the present system.
''Many of the current generation of older people and their families continue to feel betrayed by the failure of what they had been led to believe was a 'cradle to grave' welfare state to fund their care properly,'' the statement said.
''Some are struggling inappropriately with care at home because they cannot afford the residential care they need. Others are bitter at the enforced loss of their home, and of the dignity that goes with it, to pay for their care.''
The timing of the statement, which coincides with the start of Labour's party conference in Bournemouth, could hardly be more embarrassing for ministers.
Paul Burstow, Liberal Democrat spokesman for the elderly. said their care was going to become a key election issue.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article