March 3.
The report about the 50p increase in cost per prescription item, and
increased dental charges, announced just before the Budget, indicates
that the sick are being viewed unsympathetically by the Treasury (March
3).
This fund-raising process must return a considerable profit where many
prescription items cost less than the #4.25 to be charged from April.
A course of antibiotics is about 50p for 10 days' supply.
Many illnesses and conditions requiring treatment are self-induced by
the ill-informed consumer, for example chest infections linked with
smoking and dental decay due to excess confectionery, sugar-saturated
acidic soft drinks, and poor dental hygiene, and yet tobacco advertising
continues unabated and Scots have long had the poorest dentition in
Europe.
The revenue on tobacco alone is in excess of #5800m per annum and
tobacco-related deaths in the UK are 110,000 for the same period.
The West of Scotland, in common with Northern Ireland, has the highest
death rate due to preventable lung cancer and heart disease directly
linked to consumer lifestyle. Behind this unacceptable figure very many
more are sick and require medication.
People on low incomes are more likely to smoke, drink in excess,
consume fast foods loaded with fat and sugar, and lack motivation to
exercise.
This lifestyle carries a high risk of avoidable illnesses, pain, and
early death.
Protecting children must have a greater priority, and compulsory
health education in Scottish schools and banning tobacco advertising and
sponsorship should be worthy of serious consideration if the disease
pattern is not to be repeated.
Taxing the sick while keeping them and their children uninformed to
the preventable causes suggests that profit comes before people's
health, and that must be morally wrong.
George Bandeen,
Charity Project Manager,
Disease Prevention Organisation,
31 Lockhart Street,
Stonehouse.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article