May 1.
The appearance of a number of death threats is a worrying new
development in Scottish politics. While these are undoubtedly the work
of demented cranks, and since threats are hardly new in public life,
there are some who say that they should be simply dismissed.
However, when one realises that they have appeared at the same time as
the increasing profile of anti-English organisations like Settler Watch
and Scottish Watch, I believe that we have reason to be concerned. Along
with stories of English-born residents being hounded out of Scotland it
adds up to a feeling that the civilised climate which used to
characterise the Scottish political scene may be in some danger.
It must now be the duty of all Scottish politicians to make it clear
that anti-English sentiment should be as unacceptable in our land as any
anti-black and anti-Jewish sentiment. Only by outlawing completely from
the Scottish political vocabulary the pillorying of the English or any
other nationality will we rescue ourselves from the putrid quagmire
appearing in London's East End and on the continent.
There will, I suppose, be those who will excuse the recent attacks on
certain members of the Commons Committee on the Local Government Bill
for being English rather than for being Tory. But there is no doubt that
the constant repetition of these attacks, with the emphasis always on
the ''English,'' has fuelled and given respectability to the prejudices
of the lunatic fringe who need only a minimal encouragement to pursue
their odious campaigns.
I am as patriotically Scottish as any Nationalist but I see pride in
our country as being positive and attractive, cherishing as it does that
atmosphere of political debate which hitherto has been robust but also
decent and civilised. If any party leadership, for any short-term
advantage, should encourage the baser instincts of a tiny minority then
it will be to do the ultimate disservice to the people of Scotland we
seek to serve.
George Robertson,
House of Commons.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article