ENGLAND'S selectors, with Ted Dexter chairing a meeting for the final
time, last night faced ''Judge-ment day'' as they sat down to pick the
squad for the sixth Test at the Oval starting on Thursday.
They had to decide whether or not to drop Robin Smith -- nicknamed
Judge because of his thick, wig-like hair.
Four years ago Smith was one of the few bright spots in England's
Ashes debacle, scoring 553 runs with two centuries to announce himself
on the Test match scene despite the Australians taking the series 4-0.
But this summer Smith has looked all at sea against the twin spin
threat of Shane Warne and Tim May, scoring only 283 runs with two 50s --
a poor return for a man who came into the series averaging around the
half century mark in Tests.
Smith is a certainty to tour the West Indies this winter, where three
years ago he proved he was one of the best and bravest players of fast
bowling in the world.
But commonsense should dictate Smith should be rested from the
summer's final Test action, not only to give the selectors a chance to
look at other players with a view to the forthcoming tour, but also to
allow Smith to undergo surgery on his injured right shoulder, an
operation which is currently booked for the end of the season.
Do not be surprised, however, if Smith is retained. When questioned
about the player's form and his inability to play the Australian
spinners, team manager Keith Fletcher said: ''I'm only one of four
selectors, but I would always have Robin Smith in my side.''
There is also an argument for leaving Graham Gooch out, as he has made
it clear he will not tour this winter.
Nevertheless, captain Mike Atherton has been insistent that the best
way to prepare for the West Indies tour is to halt the current run of
defeats -- nine in the last 10 Tests -- and as such, Gooch, with 538
runs in the series, remains a must at the top of the order.
Were the selectors looking beyond the Oval, their two most likely
inclusions would be Hugh Morris to open alongside Atherton and Alan
Wells.
Sussex captain Wells, scorer of a high-profile 100 in last week's
NatWest Trophy semi-final at Hove, is widely regarded as one of the best
players of fast bowling in the country.
As for the bowling, both Steve Watkin and Devon Malcolm, the two seam
bowlers overlooked from the Edgbaston squad, appear certain starters.
But while Malcolm will appreciate the normally pacey Oval pitch, for
Watkin it could be a poisoned chalice.
Omitted on the two grounds likely to offer him most help, Headingley
and Edgbaston, he now seems likely to be thrown in on a wicket which
usually offers a bowler of his type very little. In Watkins' favour,
however, is the fact that the Oval pitch usually bounces.
Of the bowlers included in the previous Test, Mark Ilott seems likely
to be left out after showing he cannot consistently swing the ball back
into the right hander, a pre-requisite for left-arm seamers. And given
that, Northamptonshire's Paul Taylor could be recalled.
John Emburey, having been picked on a ''horses for courses'' basis,
may still be retained in the squad having done such a good job last
week, but then left out next Thursday morning.
With the bowling cupboard so bare, the selectors might gamble on Angus
Fraser's return to form after injury -- 14 wickets in his last two
matches -- but they will not want to rush him back into the
international hurly-burly too quickly following two-and-a-half years out
of England action. All the same, England observer Phil Sharpe watched
him along with Phil Tufnell at Scarborough last week, so the inclusion
of either man is possible.
Possible 12:
M A Atherton (capt.), G A Gooch, R A Smith, A J Stewart (wkp), M P
Maynard, G P Thorpe, N Hussain, M P Bicknell, D E Malcolm, P M Such, S L
Watkin, J P Taylor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article