INCOMING TUC general secretary John Monks will today make an
eleventh-hour bid to smooth the way for the return to the TUC fold of
the errant EETPU electricians at next month's annual TUC Congress.
At separate meetings he will ask the Amalgamated Engineering and
Electrical Union -- which now incorporates the former EETPU -- and the
four main construction industry unions, whether there is any scope for
resolving their differences before congress.
On the face of it only a climbdown by the AEEU, by agreeing to
dissolve the old EETPU's controversial Construction and Building Trades
(CBT) section, could resolve the issue in time. The CBT stands accused
of poaching members from other unions, expecially the Union of
Construction Allied Trades and Technicians.
This appears almost as unlikely as Ucatt dropping its objections,
which were renewed as recently as last month. Tomorrrow's TUC general
council may have little choice other than to recommend that
reaffiliation of the EETPU, expelled in 1988 for its recruiting
activities, be deferred beyond the September congress in order to allow
more time for discussion.
Currently, under a temporary arrangement, only the engineering section
of the AEEU is affiliated to the TUC with the electrical section outside
of the TUC pending processing of an affiliation request by the AEEU.
The TUC will today make an official complaint to the European
Commission in a bid to reverse the abolition of Wages Councils, which
set minimum pay rates for 2.6 million workers.
In a report to the EC, the TUC accuses the Government of being in
breach of its obligations on equal pay by scrapping the councils. The
abolition, due to take effect on August 30, is ''discriminatory''
because two million of the workers whose pay is set by Wages Councils
are women, according to the TUC.
In its complaint, the TUC argues that the Government is removing one
of the last forms of protection against wage-cutting, which will lead to
increased discrimination and will widen the gap between the pay of men
and women.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article